Dear RobinAre you questionning the content of the special privileges or the special privileges as such, just for these organisations?
I leave the content part to the specialists. For the privileges I suppose there should be a very good rationale to do so. I am not aware of it.In general I am not in favor of privileges for large organisations except if this is part of a strategic move, helping openning the door for smaller ones that can asked for the same afterwards.... I do not know if this is the case.BestCaroline FigueresIICD
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhoneI would be curious to know what the NCSG membership thinks about this proposal from GAC to give special privileges to the Red Cross and International Olympic Committee in the top-level domain name space.The GNSO Council will have to vote on this proposal soon, so some awareness and input from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group on the underlying issue would be very helpful.Thank you,Robin GrossBegin forwarded message:From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
Date: September 19, 2011 11:07:42 AM PDT
To: liaison6c <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [liaison6c] GAC advice: 1) possible UDRP 2) the IOC and Red Cross/Red Crescent
FYIDear Councillors,The advice provided by the GAC has been posted on page :
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondenceAnd can be directly viewed at
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/dryden-to-van-gelder-udrp-14sep11-en.pdf
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/dryden-to-van-gelder-red-cross-14sep11-en.pdfItem 11 on the GNSO Council agenda has been updated to read as follows:Item 11: June 20 Board resolution on new gTLDs (15 minutes)As part of its resolutions on the new gTLD program, the ICANN Board passed a resolved clause during its June 20 meeting in Singapore which contained the following excerpt (Resolved 1.b):Refer to Board June 20 2011 motion on new gTLDs:Incorporation of text concerning protection for specific requested Red Cross and IOC names for the top level only during the initial application round, until the GNSO and GAC develop policy advice based on the global public interest.The GNSO Council discussed this at its July 21 meeting. A letter was sent by Kurt Pritz to Heather Dryden & Stéphane van Gelder to provide some guidance:
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/pritz-to-dryden-11aug11-en.pdfOn September 18, the GAC sent a letter to the GNSO Council providing advice on this topic:GAC advice:The Council should now discuss next steps and possible courses of action, starting with an answer to the GAC.11.1 Discussion
11.2 Next stepsThank you very much.Kind regards,GlenIP JUSTICERobin Gross, Executive Director1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USAp: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451