On 11/17/11, David Cake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I see a rule in the charter that an organisation should be the exclusive > user of at least one domain name. I see no restriction that this domain name > be non-commercial. The domain name http://www.kaswesha.kbo.co.ke/ clearly > resolves to ' a website controlled by and representing the Member > Organization', thus satisfying requirement 2.2.1.2.2 of the charter. > > So the problem McTim is worrying about here appears to be due to a > misapprehension. The Kaswesha domain name looks to satisfy the membership > requirement to me. I based it on the ruling, not the charter: "These 3 orgs were determined ineligible for NCSG membership: 1. Kaswesha Community Resource Center Reason provided for non-approval: Not the exclusive user of at least one domain name (a requirement for eligibility under NCSG Charter Section 2.2.1). They were invited to re-apply when they have a noncommercial domain name." I agree that they should be let in the club! -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel