On 11/17/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > How to reconcile these two statements is a conundrum…. Indeed. On the specifics of this application, while I am sure that KASWESHA is a non-commercial organisation, the fact that they have a .co.ke might be disqualifying. I think this is unfair. The domain kbo.co.ke is a multistakeholder PPP with the GoKenya, Google, KENIC and others coming together to make it easy to get "kenya Buisnesses Online", hence kbo.co.ke. It's a free service, so fairly popular. How does the NCSG-EC reconcile inclusion with rigid rules? -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel