On 11/17/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> How to reconcile these two statements is a conundrum….

Indeed.

On the specifics of this application, while I am sure that KASWESHA is
a non-commercial organisation, the fact that they have a .co.ke might
be disqualifying.  I think this is unfair.

The domain kbo.co.ke is a multistakeholder PPP with the GoKenya,
Google, KENIC and others coming together to make it easy to get "kenya
Buisnesses Online", hence kbo.co.ke.

It's a free service, so fairly popular.

How does the NCSG-EC reconcile inclusion with rigid rules?

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel