Saw a thought on the NCUC-Exec list: > It may be insightful for one/all calling for additional lists to indicate > how many policy development process lists they would be on, just to compare > and contrast e-loads? for me? about 25 lists for ICANN more that that for the IETF only about half dozen for the IGF …. i receive somewhere around1000+ messages per day skim 100's read scores. and some mailboxes i only get to a weekly basis or even monthly basis. some even more rarely than that - only when I hear something interesting is going on. modern mail systems are gems at organizing it all just the way i like it. so iam always in favor of additional lists. though i think people should not copy many lists on one email. but there are even filters for weeding out duplicates. i can live with it either way. but if i had a vote i vote to let a thousand mailing lists bloom. avri