On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 19 Dec 2011, at 03:10, David Cake wrote: > > > The GNSO should absolutely not throw this issue in with RC and IOC > issues IMO, and should come out fairly strongly against this idea that the > Reserved Name should be expanded on a general public interest idea. > > > Why not? Aren't they all similar/equivalent as either good or bad ideas? > yes, all equivalently bad ideas IMHO. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel