On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
On 19 Dec 2011, at 03:10, David Cake wrote:

>       The GNSO should absolutely not throw this issue in with RC and IOC issues IMO, and should come out fairly strongly against this idea that the Reserved Name should be expanded on a general public interest idea.


Why not? Aren't they all similar/equivalent as either good or bad ideas?

yes, all equivalently bad ideas IMHO.


--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel