If I understood the last meeting correctly, it interpretatively was made out to bear impact on whether or not the Board could decide on reserving in the SLD and/or in the second round as a matter of implementation of an already decided policy (vs a PDP).

Neither interpretive sides (although the side pushing for implementation was more vocal) had much justificatory clout going for them with regard the purported link with how to go on and the fact that both names were already reserved.

Nicolas

On 1/8/2012 10:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">Hi,

BTW is it significant that the Red Cross and the IOC are already listed as reserved for this round of TLDs?

2.2.1.2.3 Strings Ineligible for Delegation
The following names are prohibited from delegation as

table is on page 2.9



International Olympic Committee
OLYMPIC OLYMPIAD OLYMPIQUE
OLYMPIADE OLYMPISCH OLÍMPICO
OLIMPÍADA أوليمبياد أوليمبي
奥林匹克 奥林匹亚 奧林匹克
奧林匹亞 Ολυμπιακοί Ολυμπιάδα
올림픽 올림피아드 Олимпийский
Олимпиада
1BInternational Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
REDCROSS REDCRESCENT REDCRYSTAL
REDLIONANDSUN MAGENDDAVIDADOM REDSTAROFDAVID
CROIXROUGE CROIX-ROUGE CROISSANTROUGE
CROISSANT-ROUGE CRISTALROUGE CRISTAL-ROUGE
מגן דוד אדום CRUZROJA MEDIALUNAROJA
CRISTALROJO Красный Крест Красный Полумесяц
Красный Кристалл لالهلا رمحألا رمحألا بيلصلا
ﺍلكﺭيستالة ﺍلحم ﺍﺭء ءارمحلا ةرولبلا 紅十字
红十字 紅新月 红新月
紅水晶 红水晶

Or is this only about second level names, reserved list and future rounds.

thanks

avri

On 8 Jan 2012, at 20:29, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

Hello all – this FYI. The meeting is a follow up to the previous one discussing how to implement the Board decision in relation to the IOC and Red Cross.
Kind regards
Joy Liddicoat