At 9:38 AM +0100 2/4/12, William Drake wrote: >So returning to KK's original message, I am for Option 1: Recommend no >changes to Guidebook and reject GAC Proposal, with an objection on process >and precedent grounds complimenting the substantive case. > >I've not been counting, but this seems consistent with a clear majority of >views expressed here to date. > >On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote: > >>If there is interest in joint NC / AtLarge pushback I'll certainly help >>advance the idea. >> > >My guess is that NCUC would be willing to pursue this. Anyone disagree? I concur with both of these. Dan PS: Is it worth expressing a "second choice" in the case that Option 1 is rejected by the policy group? Anybody for full ranked-choice voting here? Not to confuse things... ;-) -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.