Apologies for any confusion - I should have made that option 8, not 7.... Joy -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan Krimm Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 4:54 p.m. To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level At 3:27 PM +1300 2/14/12, Joy Liddicoat wrote: >Perhaps, if there is no agreement there is an option 7: The specific >names are locked and no-one can have them ;) I actually like this one a lot! :-) Dan -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.