Apologies for any confusion - I should have made that option 8, not 7....
Joy
-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan
Krimm
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 4:54 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top
Level

At 3:27 PM +1300 2/14/12, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

>Perhaps, if there is no agreement there is an option 7: The specific 
>names are locked and no-one can have them ;)

I actually like this one a lot!  :-)

Dan


--
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.