On 4 Feb 2012, at 03:38, William Drake wrote: > So returning to KK's original message, I am for Option 1: Recommend no changes to Guidebook and reject GAC Proposal, with an objection on process and precedent grounds complimenting the substantive case. In terms of changes to the Guidebook. Except that I think changing the Guidebook now breaks the GNSO requirements for a stable and predictable process, I would favor changing the guidebook by eliminating the BoardStaff policy that it currently contains making an exception for the IOC/IFRC. avri