Agree, this is concerning. 
However, note that it says "IF" ICANN creates an accreditation service. Have registrars agreed in principle that it should?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Wendy Seltzer
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 11:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] FW: ICANN and Registrar Negotiation Team Post
> Summary of RAA Negotiations
> 
> I'm very concerned by item 1 (below):
> 
> We should work to see the language and to ensure that it would not
> exclude the registration of names on another's behalf by an agent
> committed to protecting privacy, such as an attorney.
> 
> LEA REQUEST 1: (a) If ICANN creates a Privacy/Proxy Accreditation
> Service, Registrars will accept proxy/privacy registrations only
> from accredited providers; (b) “Registrants using privacy/proxy
> registration services will have authentic Whois information
> immediately published by Registrar when registrant is found to be
> violating terms of service”
>