I personally have no expectation on this: as Klaus says, the gates are already open.<div><br></div><div>Why the UN and 10 more. Why not 100 more? or 1024 more? </div><div><br></div><div>The process is contaminated, and this is exactly what any wise person would avoid.</div>

<div><br></div><div>BR</div><div>NG<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 April 2012 17:36, klaus.stoll <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


<div style="WORD-WRAP:break-word" dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:&#39;Calibri&#39;">
<div>Dear Friends</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Greetings. I think we need to limit the possibility to an absolute minimum, 
(UN + 10 max), IF ANY !, everything else will as Avri says open up the flood 
gates and make the whole gTLD system unmanageable because there will we hundreds 
if not thousands of exceptions and an equal number of legal actions for those 
who think they deserve them.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yours</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Klaus</div>
<div style="font-size:small;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:&#39;Calibri&#39;;display:inline;font-weight:normal">
<div style="FONT:10pt tahoma">
<div> </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND:#f5f5f5">
<div><b>From:</b> <a title="<a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a>" href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">Robin Gross</a> </div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:51 PM</div>
<div><b>To:</b> <a title="<a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a>" href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a> 
</div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> Re: Update on IOC/RC issue: motion proposed by NCSG for 
PDP</div></div></div>
<div> </div></div><div><div class="h5">
<div style="font-size:small;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:&#39;Calibri&#39;;display:inline;font-weight:normal">Thanks.  
I thought we were going to add &quot;IF ANY&quot; to the clause asking about what other 
orgs deserve such rights?  I worry that we are inviting a flood gate of 
requests for privileges by assuming there will be others (rather than ask the 
question IF there should be others first). 
<div> </div>
<div>Robin<br>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:31 AM, <a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a> wrote:</div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
  
  <div style="MARGIN:4px 4px 1px;FONT:10pt tahoma">
  <div>Hello everyone,</div>
  <div> </div>
  <div>The NCSG Policy Committee agreed that, in view of the passage of the 
  motion which adopted the IOC-RC Drafting Team&#39;s recommendations for 
  first-round protections for the IOC and RC, the GNSO should consider 
  additional protections - including any that might apply to other international 
  governmental organizations (IGOs) who have requested similar protections - 
  through a full Policy Development Process (PDP) rather than through an ad-hoc 
  drafting team.</div>
  <div> </div>
  <div>Accordingly, we proposed a motion that will be discussed at the upcoming 
  GNSO Council meeting next week on Thursday 12 April. Coincidentally, a similar 
  (but not identical) motion was also proposed by Thomas Rickert, the Nominating 
  Committee appointee to the Contracted Parties&#39; House. Both motions can be 
  viewed at <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+12+April+2012" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+12+April+2012</a>.</div>
  <div> </div>
  <div>Between now and the Council meeting, we&#39;ll be discussing with Thomas ways 
  to combine both motions so that the Council need only vote on one unified 
  motion. Early indications are that the concept is acceptable to some of the 
  other Council members, so I&#39;m hopeful that if we can successfully fuse both 
  motions, there is a fair chance of its passage.</div>
  <div> </div>
  <div>Cheers</div>
  <div>Mary</div>
  <div> </div>
  <div> </div>
  <div><strong><font color="#800080">Mary W S Wong</font></strong></div>
  <div><em>Professor of Law</em></div>
  <div><em>Chair, Graduate IP Programs</em></div>
  <div><em>Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP</em></div>
  <address>UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW</address>
  <address>Two White Street</address>
  <address>Concord, NH 03301</address>
  <address>USA</address>
  <address>Email: <a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1204%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D476814%26B%3D--20cf300faeed8f8d1004bd197ffc%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a></address>
  <address>Phone: 1-603-513-5143</address>
  <address>Webpage: <a href="http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php" target="_blank">http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php</a></address>
  <address>Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network 
  (SSRN) at: <a href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</a></address></div></blockquote></div>
<div> </div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>