On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Alain Berranger <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Excellent suggestion! Only 1: Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement). will work for me. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel