Thanks for the comments. I was stymied as to how to react, since my level of experience is far below the average on this list. Personally, I find the Ravelympics case to be particularly egregious, precisely because it is so apparently innocuous, and because Ravelry complied without a squeak.

If anyone has not yet read the article, I recommend it:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/7212016/Stitch-up-for-Olympic-knitters

I also think Bill Drake's idea of a knit-in is a solid, simple demonstration of disagreement.

Cheers,
Ginger




On 7 July 2012 07:54, Norbert Klein <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Thanks, Carlos, for the reminder - which highlights the IOC issue well - and I also want to say that I on a similar line with Tamir.

Norbert Klein

=

On 7/7/2012 5:51 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
Regarding Carson's unprofessional overreaction to a list thread -- which
involved a legitimate criticism of objectionable practices by the IOC
--, I see discussion lists as conversations, not as ritual engagements.
Just in case, I recall the link which motivated this discussion:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/7212016/Stitch-up-for-Olympic-knitters

--c.a.

On 07/03/2012 07:23 PM, Tamir Israel wrote:
Speaking as someone who does not regularly comment here (but does regularly
follow discussions), I just wanted to say that I personally find discussions
here neither 'spammy' nor 'unprofessional'.
[snip]