On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed > during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity. > Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The > limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are > sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the > master. > > Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or > controlled by a master. > Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem? If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel