Thanks for sharing this.
I still just try to understand the implications of this proposal.
Now we have, for example, already operational:
http://www.olympicair.com – Olympic Air, an airline operating over
100 daily flights, would not be allowed to register also under any
new gTLD? So the proposal favors the use of .com only where they
have already a registration?
Then there are the hotels, and surely thousands of further
variations:
www.olympichotel.com.au/
www.hotelolympic.com/
royal-olympic-athens.hotel-rez.com/
The proposal would not allow any more registrations of these and
any similar addresses under the new gTLDs, but they can continue
to be olympic under .com or keep their .com.au addresses, but no
similar new ones under the new gTLDs?
Just too complex for me to understand how and by whom this would
be administered - and of course: WHY?
Norbert
=
On 8/29/2012 7:34 PM, Avri Doria wrote: