I am not very impressed with this response. The reference to a “balance” between rights and needs of law enforcement seems to imply that established privacy rights can
be ignored if LEAs find it convenient to do so. It seems to pretend that the global Whois does not constitute an exception to European data protection law as it now stands. References to GAC communiques does not help, as the GAC, under the thumb of the US,
has been a major obstacle to bringing data protection concerns into the Whois debate.
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 11:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] European Commission responds to NCUC's letter on whois privacy concerns - Fwd: Ares(2012)966299 - Online privacy in ICANN
Begin forwarded message:
From:
EC ARES NOREPLY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
August 10, 2012 8:42:30 AM PDT
To:
"CAKE David (IP JUSTICE)" <[log in to unmask]>
To:
"GROSS Robin (IP JUSTICE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Ares(2012)966299 - Online privacy in ICANN
Please find attached document Ares(2012)966299 concerning "Online privacy in ICANN" sent by Mr HARTOG Eddy on 10/08/2012.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This e-mail was automatically generated by the European Commission's central mail registration system.
Replies by e-mail must be addressed to the original sender HARTOG Eddy (mailto:[log in to unmask]).
Remarque : Cet e-mail a été généré automatiquement par le système d'enregistrement central du courrier de la Commission européenne.
Toute réponse éventuelle par e-mail doit être adressée à l'expéditeur en personne, à savoir HARTOG Eddy (mailto:[log in to unmask]).
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451