To me, this only reaffirms Professor Mueller's statement about objecting to sensitivities. If every country objected (and won the argument) based on a sensitivity issue...



Kind regards,
 
 
Mark Leiser
 

145 Kilmarnock Road
Suite 612
Glasgow G41 3JA
Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248
Email: [log in to unmask]
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser
Fax: +44 0141-404-2633





On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
What if Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines wanted .virgin? That would actually make sense.

http://www.virgin.com/company


On 8/14/2012 9:38 PM, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
  We've been discussing new gTLDs and HR. Milton objected to the
statement:  "Consideration of applications for new TLDs should be
mindful of sensitivities."

  KSA objects to .virgin, .baby, and others

http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/0/14/icann.receives.registration.complaints.on.moral.health.grounds/


   The sensitivities of the KSA have been aroused.