On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity. Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the master.

Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or controlled by a master.

Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem?
 

If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS.

--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel