Microsoft? Kind regards, Mark Leiser 145 Kilmarnock Road Suite 612 Glasgow G41 3JA Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248 Email: [log in to unmask] Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser Fax: +44 0141-404-2633 On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Kerry Brown <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I’m not sure who or what you mean by “MS”?**** > > ** ** > > Kerry Brown**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of > *Carl Smith > *Sent:* August-22-12 12:59 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] The DNS problem**** > > ** ** > > Thanks McTim, > > However, DNS is an IP look up system and re-director, where LISP is a > programing language. MS has the major influence in the DNS system. We > need a less single source dominated system. Our hope must come from the > Open Source mavericks to provide the way. > > Lou > > On 8/21/2012 11:29 AM, McTim wrote:**** > > ** ** > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> > wrote:**** > > The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed > during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity. > Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The > limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are > sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the > master.**** > > Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or > controlled by a master.**** > > > > Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem? > > > If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS. > **** > > > -- > Cheers, > > McTim > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route > indicates how we get there." Jon Postel**** > > ** ** >