Good morning/afternoon/evening,

I strongly believe that we should continue discussions or involve somehow the EC within our discussions.

As we all know, the US and the EU system might not be always on the same line in terms of privacy and/or other Internet related issues.

Nevertheless, it is a good step towards achieving our goals.

Have an excellent weekend.

Regards,



Andrei Barburas

Community Relations Services Officer

 

International Institute for Communication and Development (IICD)

P.O. Box 11586, 2502 AN The Hague, The Netherlands


Mobile: +31 62 928 2879

Phone: +31 70 311 7311
Fax: +31 70 311 7322
Website: www.iicd.org

 

People   ICT   Development




On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
On 8/10/2012 2:17 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
sounds like we should make sure Reding gets a copy.

avri

On 10 Aug 2012, at 16:51, Robin Gross wrote:


Begin forwarded message:


From: EC ARES NOREPLY <[log in to unmask]>
Date: August 10, 2012 8:42:30 AM PDT
To: "CAKE David (IP JUSTICE)" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "GROSS Robin (IP JUSTICE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Ares(2012)966299 - Online privacy in ICANN

Please find attached document Ares(2012)966299 concerning "Online privacy in ICANN" sent by Mr HARTOG Eddy on 10/08/2012.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This e-mail was automatically generated by the European Commission's central mail registration system.
Replies by e-mail must be addressed to the original sender HARTOG Eddy (mailto:[log in to unmask]).
Remarque : Cet e-mail a été généré automatiquement par le système d'enregistrement central du courrier de la Commission européenne.
Toute réponse éventuelle par e-mail doit être adressée à l'expéditeur en personne, à savoir HARTOG Eddy (mailto:[log in to unmask]).

<reply-to-NCUC-20120807-ag2Ares[1] AB.pdf>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]





    

    

    

      
Your posting to the NCSG-DISCUSS list has been rejected by the content filter.
Please resubmit with a non-blank subject.


    

    

    
ForwardedMessage.eml

    

      
        

          
            
From:
            

            Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>		
        

        

          
            
Date:
            

            8/10/2012 4:25 PM		
        

      
    

    

      
        

          
            
To: 

            [log in to unmask]		
        

      
    

    

    
Consensus rule is most like the game
      of one shell in a revolver. Not that participants are
      intentionally contrary to reality, but rather; misinformed, narrow
      minded, or hold a personal stake. The path well trodden often
      leads to a dead end at some point. Diversity, though it seems to
      mean confusion, is much more likely to find a better and more
      sustainable solution to a current question. In the end, perfection
      may not be reached, however it may be more closely approached. I
      am more inclined to diversity in rule of order. The rule being
      flexible enough to allow for a different path and yet rigidly
      opposed to authoritarian mandate. Historically, loosening the
      bonds on entrepreneurs to build commerce has greatly improved
      standards of living around the world. When entrepreneurs are
      suppressed by what ever means for the preservation of a de facto
      elite, standards of life and health decline.

    


    

    
Just my opinion.

    


    

    
Lou Smith