Hi Well I do not think we needed a none of the above to stand against each of the candidates. I think one of them would have been enough. ie. candidate 1 .... candidate n none of the above. with everyone having 3 votes and the top 3 winning. i believe in NOTA, but in moderation. "Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Milton, > Great that the winners beat "None of the Above." Next time, how about >inserting "Some of the Above" as a choice? Let us see how the >candidates >will fare against that. B-) > > >-- >Bombim Cadiz >***************************************** >* Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) -- * >* No windows. No gates. It is open. * >* No Bill. It is Free. * >***************************************** Avri Doria