On 11 October 2012 23:45, Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > < > http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121009_multi_stakeholderism_revisited_icann_we_can_do_better/ > > > The flaws in Katim's article are quite numerous, but that's a different thread. My first instinct is probably completely in left field but I'll put it out there anyway: Merge the proposed group with the ISP stakeholders and call the newly-rechartered result the "infrastructure constituency" -- which is what I thought it should have been in the first place. - Evan