On 11 October 2012 23:45, Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> <
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20121009_multi_stakeholderism_revisited_icann_we_can_do_better/
> >
>

The flaws in Katim's article are quite numerous, but that's a different
thread.

My first instinct is probably completely in left field but I'll put it out
there anyway:

Merge the proposed group with the ISP stakeholders and call the
newly-rechartered result the "infrastructure constituency" -- which is what
I thought it should have been in the first place.

- Evan