I think there's room for constructive engagement, and I would welcome it. From how and what you say below, I am convince that you can do so diplomatically. Nicolas On 23/10/2012 3:31 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote: > > Now, a question: What is the preference here towards the level of my > participation? Is it that I stay relatively quiet except for > specifically-defined points of joint engagement? Or is it OK if I > occasionally wade into discussions, giving (my own personal take on) > the ALAC perspective on issues that we have worked upon. If so > engaged, will always indicate when an opinion is my own, based on a > formal ALAC statement, or on my own reading of the mood of the > At-Large Community. I'm OK to engage at any level. While such PoVs may > at times differ from the prevailing mood of NCSG, it's not my intent > to be disruptive.