From the application documents, looks like they are trying to create an association, rather than being an already established group.  

Perhaps as a member of NPOC rather than a new constituency?

Adam

On Thursday, October 11, 2012, Marc Perkel wrote:

I agree - Non-Commercial means non-commercial. So the for profit can go somewhere else.

On 10/10/2012 8:42 PM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:

ICANN's Silo model indeed produces a problem for this group. I think what
they really need to do is split themselves for the purposes of ICANN formal
structures into two groups: "non-profit Public Internet Access" and
"Cyber-cafes and other commercial shared computer access providers", apply
for NCSG/CSG group membership but agree amongst themselves that they will
coordinate strongly between them on promoting the clear common interests such
a group has.

I'm afraid I could not support the inclusion of for-profit access providers
in an NCSG constituency as it violates the non-commercial principle of SG
membership.