What about a broad message of support to the nomcom about how we're happy with moves taken & will watch closely and with interest? (and then actually watch, closely and with interest..?) Message could be quite short and sweet - happy to draft/assist. Maria On 26 October 2012 03:19, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 25 Oct 2012, at 21:43, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > > @Avri thanks for your comment, can you please explain what you mean by > issues of process discussion in more detail? > > > > > > > e.g. > > " > 5. established clear distinctions between ‘transparency’ and > ‘confidentiality > " > > what are those clear distinctions? > > " > 8. did an in-depth review of the Statement of Interest form (SOI) to > improve clarity for candidates and to enhance and enable the output of the > Committee; > " > > what did that review find. what is being done to improve clarity for > candidates > > " > reviews of the 2013 NomCom Rules and Procedures; confidentiality > requirements; Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest parameters > " > > Sounds enchanting. what did these reviews uncover. What conclusions were > reached. > > What this report does is shows us the covers of the chapter headings, but > not the contents. None of this stuff concerns private data, hence it seems > to be stuff that should be explained in greater detail. > > So while I am grateful for the start, it is a first that should be > congratulated, it is only a start. > > thanks for asking > > avri >