thanks Maria for volunteering, a clear message will have an influence for sure , improving transparency and process need a constant and continuous support and feedback. Best, Rafik 2012/10/28 Maria Farrell <[log in to unmask]> > What about a broad message of support to the nomcom about how we're happy > with moves taken & will watch closely and with interest? > > (and then actually watch, closely and with interest..?) > > Message could be quite short and sweet - happy to draft/assist. > > Maria > > > On 26 October 2012 03:19, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 25 Oct 2012, at 21:43, Rafik Dammak wrote: >> >> > @Avri thanks for your comment, can you please explain what you mean by >> issues of process discussion in more detail? >> > >> > >> >> >> e.g. >> >> " >> 5. established clear distinctions between ‘transparency’ and >> ‘confidentiality >> " >> >> what are those clear distinctions? >> >> " >> 8. did an in-depth review of the Statement of Interest form (SOI) to >> improve clarity for candidates and to enhance and enable the output of the >> Committee; >> " >> >> what did that review find. what is being done to improve clarity for >> candidates >> >> " >> reviews of the 2013 NomCom Rules and Procedures; confidentiality >> requirements; Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest parameters >> " >> >> Sounds enchanting. what did these reviews uncover. What conclusions >> were reached. >> >> What this report does is shows us the covers of the chapter headings, but >> not the contents. None of this stuff concerns private data, hence it seems >> to be stuff that should be explained in greater detail. >> >> So while I am grateful for the start, it is a first that should be >> congratulated, it is only a start. >> >> thanks for asking >> >> avri >> > >