Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express our concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO Council (and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion through regardless of proper process)? I think we need to draw attention to these problems where councilors are creating such privileges for their own clients with their council votes and also resubmitting a rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of interest causing the problem in the first place. Thanks, Robin On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI >> today, >> following the Council meeting. >> Joy > > > It may have been referred to the SCI, > but that is a case too late. > > the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed > through. > in my opinion this was illegitimate. > and should have waited on the recommendation of the SCI. > > avri > IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]