-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sure Robin, I think that is a good idea. Joy On 21/12/2012 11:31 a.m., Robin Gross wrote: > Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express > our concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO > Council (and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion > through regardless of proper process)? I think we need to draw > attention to these problems where councilors are creating such > privileges for their own clients with their council votes and also > resubmitting a rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of > interest causing the problem in the first place. > > Thanks, Robin > > On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > >> On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI >>> today, following the Council meeting. Joy >> >> >> It may have been referred to the SCI, but that is a case too >> late. >> >> the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed >> through. in my opinion this was illegitimate. and should have >> waited on the recommendation of the SCI. >> >> avri >> > > > > > IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San > Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 > w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ05VeAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqV8EIALwLC4j0lUyBi3mOA8CDM2hC dCrmFoTDUN1nIM74zCJdY5+/0WE/9zf1iR2T9JYjWV4/0QwHmnrDauRDaRDsonnU jTzEvH5pGZVeJAJFMTVtYYUgaI9BMJb7EFFZsuJ/XerUAchTqds3BSa3cGscNXCQ Yv1MDxLwQUd7FOoc/077KMQbyo+cGdt2q6AeiF1p/mxxcjEr/xwNJchzBsrFdyVg Rso6G4cTvFkJBMY9kkEiq9vi9X3xWPQcN6nh03MeHLIw7kH1PJKFeM7+9bwElP1z TDLR/b681/zqq+alpeL1rq65SZenNaBa+2cj/UliZjIoyfXHG0rR3ZaRmi5mD+Q= =sco1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----