Dear Colleagues,

In general I find it hard to imagine that the GNSO Council should/would vote again if the motion has been re-tabled as it was when rejected... Perhaps better to wait for Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements Implementation (SCI) to look at the situation?

Alain

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, joy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear colleagues,
We have had this approach from a fellow GNSO Councillor.
Please share your views to help guide us. At the NCSG meeting
yesterday (MP3 recording circulated yesterday by Robin) we agreed to
raise a number of procedural concerns about this re-tabled motion, to
make the point we vigorously oppose it, but we did not agree to
request a deferral (a course of action I would not support).
Views?
Joy



- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: IOC/RC
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:26:31 -0800
From: Mason Cole <[log in to unmask]>
To: David Cake <[log in to unmask]>, Maria Farrell
<[log in to unmask]>, "Joy Liddicoat ([log in to unmask])"
<[log in to unmask]>, Magaly <[log in to unmask]>, Wendy Seltzer
<[log in to unmask]>, Wolfgang Kleinwächter
<[log in to unmask]>

Greetings NCSG colleagues --

I'm writing about tomorrow's scheduled IOC/RC vote.  I wanted to get
your temperature on this as I've been thinking about it for some time now.

I agree with you that the position we find ourselves in now was
arrived at through a bad process.  I'm not in favor of reconsidering
motions in general, and I hope the council is better educated on
procedure (I know I'm trying myself).  I'm concerned about the
council's image regarding efficiency and that certainly didn't help.
I'm hoping we can get this voted on tomorrow and get it behind us,
whether the result is yea or nay.  I'm concerned if someone tries to
defer, it will merely delay -- we've debated the issue pretty
thoroughly and I doubt any votes will change.

Any thoughts on this?

Mason





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0haeAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqZBoH/0gjbkRPleW5Vf303V3PzZAb
I8bnmbFbF27qAOS2eGhPVsmOnrBZaEGAihmPDEJFJKua0xsl+5N1zVLRgjceITPA
WzU1DnhABHQr02PejjDjcJyqYfzc5S85p4pJp0y+CNTNsG9DxHpqnmL5j5kLQ/Or
ls53tlYACaYnv6D7tWpzOpkzwUs77llcKf1lws3KK2juiwBhezqGUNt2f92bx836
PrMZza4GuoWGvHwytVA6JKCyygp4ogiuFblFzfMBsCZE3mc3ct4MpHXrPHlwEPqw
hfvH+1/D7wpDoKsDXeHVNA50la9ONY+rKczFrjzHdn/emkvo8Gs8SN4ry6OXHzc=
=wc/9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger


AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de votre coopération.

CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose, distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.