I would support this. Seasons greetings, Bill On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:31 PM, Robin Gross wrote: > Perhaps NCSG should make an official public statement to express our concern regarding the mis-handling of this issue by the GNSO Council (and possibly staff due to their shepherding of the motion through regardless of proper process)? I think we need to draw attention to these problems where councilors are creating such privileges for their own clients with their council votes and also resubmitting a rejected motion without dealing with the conflict of interest causing the problem in the first place. > > Thanks, > Robin > > On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > >> On 20 Dec 2012, at 14:22, joy wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Thanks all for the comments. The matter was referred to the SCI today, >>> following the Council meeting. >>> Joy >> >> >> It may have been referred to the SCI, >> but that is a case too late. >> >> the motion that both staff and the chair wanted passed was rammed through. >> in my opinion this was illegitimate. >> and should have waited on the recommendation of the SCI. >> >> avri >> > > > > > IP JUSTICE > Robin Gross, Executive Director > 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA > p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 > w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask] > > >