Hmmm... if this "judicial branch" is to be independent it cannot be a "branch", I guess? --c.a. On 01/22/2013 04:49 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > How do either of the two candidates view the question of an independent review system, or more broadly the role of a "judicial branch" in ICANN's governance structure? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> Avri Doria >> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:33 AM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Questions & Concerns for our >> Representatives on the Accountability & Transparency Review Team (ATRT2) >> >> On 21 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Robin Gross wrote: >> >>> Therefore now have a 24-hour period to ask the two NCSG candidates >> questions and to provide them with initial feedback about desired >> outcomes for the ATRT (using this list beginning now). >>> >> >> >> Thanks Robin, for opening this topic. >> >> I think that the AOC reviews are among the most important work we do >> outside of Policy recommendations. And I think that the ATRT - being >> responsible for reviewing, and then recommending improvements on, the >> accountability and transparency of ICANN is central to any evolution we >> might someday see ICANN and its ability to become a free standing >> dynamic organization. >> >> Even if this list does not have any specific questions for the two of us >> who have asked for the NCSG endorsement, I would really like to hear >> about issues that are currently on people's minds about the specific >> issues that need to be covered by the upcoming review. >> >> Thanks >> >> avri >> >> Ps: Dan, I remember that I owe you an answer on Dynamic Organizational >> Architectures which includes the issue of accountability. While I am >> still working on that theoretical answer, in a practical sense, I think >> that accountable and transparent Accountability and Transparency >> Reviews, are a key ingredient. >