People, please be relax... it is carnival and the Pope has resigned! Let's celebrate! Websites, wikis etc. are always a working in progress... I am happy that there are vonlunteers and icann staff working on that :-) Magaly On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > cheers > > avri > > On 11 Feb 2013, at 00:03, Edward Morris wrote: > > > > > Thanks for clarifying that Avri. > > > > I assume this was informal? > > There was not vote on the issue if that is what you mean by formal. > > > > > One of the best parts of transparency is everyone knows who made what > decision. That way displeasure or approval are directed at the proper > parties. > > > > It was done on the NCSG-PC list, which has an open archive < > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/> which everyone in the > world is free to peruse any time they wish. > > > > At NCUC we now know we can't count on the stability of our confluence > presence should our NCSG colleagues have a change of heart. As such, we can > act appropriately in redesigning our web presence. > > > > As far as i know, the NCUC has chosen NOT to use the confluence wiki, > whereas NCSG has, and it looks like NPOC has as well. > > Other then making any references to the NCUC that are appropriate, I see > NO connection between the NCSG wiki and the NCUC wiki. > > Certainly I think it will be useful to track any statements that might > come out of the NCUC or NPOC on the NCSG wiki and thus have attempted to > take that into the account in the tables I am proposing for tracking the > NCSG-PC's work. > > But the NCUC should feel free to do whatever it pleases in terms of > establishing its own wiki. I do not see why NCSG wiki decisions have any > bearing on that at all. > > Also in terms of transparency, I think saying "look, look, what I have > done" covers that at least to some extent. As for accountability, the > NCUC-EC that appointed me to the NCSG-PC, can withdraw my appointment > anytime it is displeased. I think that is how accountability in the NCSG > works: you fire the bums. As one of the NCUC Executives, it is in your > power to initiate that process should you feel I have transgressed against > transparency or accountability. > > BTW, while we are asking questions based on my request for WG > participation info, are you participating in Working Groups, the question > that started this entire thread? One of the interesting things some of are > discovering is that in the GNSO, in general, we have more people in > Constituency and Stakeholder boss roles than we have in Working Groups - > sort of an inverse pyramidical notion of bottom-up. In addition to finding > out where NCSG people are working on policy, i.e. the working groups, I am > curious as to what the NCSG ratio of bosses:workers is. > > thanks > > avri > >