+1 This is what we feared. No more ad hoc!! Cut off the nose now. Dan -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer. At 11:53 AM +0900 2/14/13, Andrew A. Adams wrote: >I seem to recall that our (NCUC, perhaps not NPOC) view on the Board's >decision to grant IOC/ICRC protections without a PDP represented the nose of >the camel in the tent and that this would likely lead to an attempt by the >rest of the IGO community to believe that they could expect similar >treatment). Our prediction is coming true, and this is the rest of the camel >being pushed into the tent. I fully support strong efforts to push for a >proper measured PDP approach to solving this issue and against these ad hoc >special treatments for special interests. > > > >-- >Professor Andrew A Adams [log in to unmask] >Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and >Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics >Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan http://www.a-cubed.info/