A huge smile for Magaly who keeps everything in perspective... and keeps everyone smiling! Tx Magaly :-), Kathy : > People, please be relax... it is carnival and the Pope has resigned! > Let's celebrate! > Websites, wikis etc. are always a working in progress... I am happy > that there are vonlunteers and icann staff working on that :-) > Magaly > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > cheers > > avri > > On 11 Feb 2013, at 00:03, Edward Morris wrote: > > > > > Thanks for clarifying that Avri. > > > > I assume this was informal? > > There was not vote on the issue if that is what you mean by formal. > > > > > One of the best parts of transparency is everyone knows who made > what decision. That way displeasure or approval are directed at > the proper parties. > > > > It was done on the NCSG-PC list, which has an open archive > <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/> which everyone > in the world is free to peruse any time they wish. > > > > At NCUC we now know we can't count on the stability of our > confluence presence should our NCSG colleagues have a change of > heart. As such, we can act appropriately in redesigning our web > presence. > > > > As far as i know, the NCUC has chosen NOT to use the confluence > wiki, whereas NCSG has, and it looks like NPOC has as well. > > Other then making any references to the NCUC that are appropriate, > I see NO connection between the NCSG wiki and the NCUC wiki. > > Certainly I think it will be useful to track any statements that > might come out of the NCUC or NPOC on the NCSG wiki and thus have > attempted to take that into the account in the tables I am > proposing for tracking the NCSG-PC's work. > > But the NCUC should feel free to do whatever it pleases in terms > of establishing its own wiki. I do not see why NCSG wiki > decisions have any bearing on that at all. > > Also in terms of transparency, I think saying "look, look, what I > have done" covers that at least to some extent. As for > accountability, the NCUC-EC that appointed me to the NCSG-PC, can > withdraw my appointment anytime it is displeased. I think that is > how accountability in the NCSG works: you fire the bums. As one of > the NCUC Executives, it is in your power to initiate that process > should you feel I have transgressed against transparency or > accountability. > > BTW, while we are asking questions based on my request for WG > participation info, are you participating in Working Groups, the > question that started this entire thread? One of the interesting > things some of are discovering is that in the GNSO, in general, we > have more people in Constituency and Stakeholder boss roles than > we have in Working Groups - sort of an inverse pyramidical notion > of bottom-up. In addition to finding out where NCSG people are > working on policy, i.e. the working groups, I am curious as to > what the NCSG ratio of bosses:workers is. > > thanks > > avri > >