On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > hi, > > In which case, if I really wanted honey for some reason I would apply for > .miele or .דבש or .asali > > or register honey.shop or honey.coop or honey.ri.us or honey.eat or > honey.farm or honey.food or ..... > > I do not see the point of arguing about what content someone allows in > their gTLD. And to me this largely comes down to a content issue. We are > saying that everyone has a right to put content under the TLD .honey. And > I just don't see it. > +1 > > I also see it as an association issue. Why does ICANN have authority to > tell a gTLD owner who they must associate with, i.e who they must allow to > use the gTLD they have been allocated. > > agreed -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel