On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
hi,

In which case, if I really wanted honey for some reason I would apply for .miele or .דבש or .asali

or register  honey.shop or honey.coop  or honey.ri.us or honey.eat or honey.farm or honey.food or .....

I do  not see the point of arguing about what content someone allows in their gTLD.  And to me this largely comes down to a content issue.  We are saying that everyone has a right to put content under the TLD .honey.  And I just don't see it.

+1
 

I also see it as an association issue.  Why does ICANN have authority to tell a gTLD owner who they must associate with, i.e who they must allow to use the gTLD they have been allocated.


agreed


--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel