Hi Alex,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alex Gakuru <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3D1302%26L%3DNCSG-DISCUSS%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D11681269%26B%3D--000e0ce070da186a7d04d6938cf4%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Allowing closed generics will lead to massive traffic redirections </blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>how so?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

worse than on .xxx circumstances compelling the concerned to take that string&#39;s allowable defensive registrations route.    <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>If they are closed, how can they get a defensive registration?</div>

<div><br></div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>&quot;A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there.&quot;  Jon Postel