I will join the call when my current meeting has a break. I note that there are no motions on the table. --Wendy On 02/12/2013 02:29 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > Hi, > > Reminder, it is only 90 minutes until the meeting. > > I am hoping enough of the elected g-council members will be able to attend in order to have a full conversation onf the issue before the g-council. > > thanks > > avri > > > On 12 Feb 2013, at 04:07, Robin Gross wrote: > >> Reminder: today is NCSG's monthly policy meeting and all NCSG members are welcome to join the call. Details below. >> >> Avri Doria has graciously agreed to step in and chair the discusion since I will be going through security at the airport at the time of the meeting and so my connection will not be stable enough to chair the discussion. But I will be able to join for part of the mtg. >> >> I hope you all will join the call! >> >> Thanks, >> Robin >> >> >>> >>> 2013/2/10, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]>: >>> >>> Reminder: I hope you all will join in Tuesday's NCSG Open Policy >>> >>> Meeting, which is an open discussion between the NCSG Policy >>> >>> Committee, including the NCSG GNSO Councilors and the entire NCSG >>> >>> membership. The meeting is held 12 Feb., which is 2 days before the >>> >>> next GNSO Council meeting to help prepare for NCSG's participation in >>> >>> that meeting. Dial-in and remote participation details are below. >>> >>> Also below is a revised discussion agenda. If anyone needs a dial- >>> >>> out, please let me know at least 24-hours before the meeting to >>> >>> ensure we have enough time to make the dial-out happen. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please join in the discussion. Thank you! >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Robin >>> >>> >>> >>> NCSG Policy Open Meeting >>> >>> 12 February 2013 >>> >>> 21:00 - 23:00 UTC >>> >>> >>> >>> Other Time Zones: >>> >>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=NCSG+Open >>> >>> +Policy+Meeting+February+2013&iso=20130212T21&p1=1440&ah=2 >>> >>> >>> >>> Remote Participation Details: >>> >>> Telephone: http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Passcodes.htm >>> >>> Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/_a819976787/ncsg/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Discussion Agenda: >>> >>> >>> >>> I. Discussion of Intercessional Meeting in LA >>> >>> a) Update from participants >>> >>> b) Next Steps / Follow Ups: >>> >>> i) Possible letter to ICANN requesting input in org's engagement >>> >>> plans >>> >>> ii) Policy "cheat sheets" - 1-page summary of policy issues >>> >>> requested by CEO >>> >>> >>> >>> II. Preparation for GNSO Council Meeting of 14 February 2013 >>> >>> Council Agenda & Motions: >>> >>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Council >>> >>> +Meeting+2013-02-14 >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Strawman Model, Trademark Clearinghouse & Blocking (aka >>> >>> "defensive registrations") >>> >>> NCSG Statement : http://forum.icann.org/lists/tmch-strawman/ >>> >>> msg00029.html >>> >>> >>> >>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council: >>> >>> "ICANN’s CEO has requested GNSO Council input on the Strawman >>> >>> Proposal developed through the TMCH related implementation >>> >>> discussions, which has been posted for public comment. http:// >>> >>> www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30nov12-en.htm. >>> >>> ICANN’s CEO additionally requested Council input on the joint >>> >>> proposal from the Business Constituency/Intellectual Property >>> >>> Constituency (BC/IPC) for a “limited preventative registration >>> >>> mechanism” which is also currently available for public comment. A >>> >>> subsequent note (19 December 2012) from ICANN’s CEO clarified the >>> >>> desired deadline for input to be no later than 22 February 2013. >>> >>> >>> >>> Related to this discussion is the Staff briefing paper (http:// >>> >>> gnso.icann.org/en/node/32287) to the GNSO Council on the topic of >>> >>> defensive registrations at the second level, in response to a >>> >>> previous request from the New GLTD Committee (2012.04.10.NG2). The >>> >>> New GTLD Committee requested the GNSO to consider whether additional >>> >>> work on defensive registrations at the second level should be >>> >>> undertaken. >>> >>> >>> >>> The Council is to continue to discuss: (i) a response to the ICANN >>> >>> CEOs request, and (ii) to consider whether to undertake any >>> >>> additional work related to the BC/IPC proposal and/or the Staff >>> >>> briefing paper, on the topic of second level defensive registrations." >>> >>> >>> >>> b) Public Comments: >>> >>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/tmch- >>> >>> strawman-30nov12-en.htm >>> >>> 5 or 22 Feb? >>> >>> >>> >>> 2. Special Privileges for RedCross, Olympic Cmtes, IGO's? >>> >>> >>> >>> a) IGO-INGO Working Group - purpose - status >>> >>> NCSG Input Statement to Working Group >>> >>> >>> >>> b) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg: >>> >>> "At its 26 November 2012 meeting, the Board requested that the GNSO >>> >>> continue its work on policy recommendations on top and second-level >>> >>> protections for certain IGO and INGO names on an expedited basis. >>> >>> >>> >>> In addition, the Board requested that the GNSO Council advise the >>> >>> Board by no later than 28 February 2013 if it is aware of any concern >>> >>> such as with the global public interest or the security or stability >>> >>> of the DNS, that the Board should take into account in making its >>> >>> decision about whether to include second level protections for >>> >>> certain IGO names and acronyms by inclusion on a Reserved Names List >>> >>> in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook, applicable in all >>> >>> new gTLD registries approved in the first round of the New gTLD >>> >>> Program. The specific IGO names to be protected shall be those names >>> >>> or acronyms that: 1) qualify under the current existing criteria to >>> >>> register a domain name in the .int gTLD; and 2) have a >>> >>> registered .int domain OR a determination of eligibility under >>> >>> the .int criteria; and 3) apply to ICANN to be listed on the reserved >>> >>> names list for the second level prior to the delegation of any new >>> >>> gTLDs by no later than 28 February 2013." >>> >>> >>> >>> 3. So-called "Closed Generic" TLDs >>> >>> >>> >>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg: >>> >>> The New gTLD Program Committee recently directed the ICANN CEO to >>> >>> request the GNSO to provide guidance on the issue of "closed generic" >>> >>> TLDs, , concurrent with the opening of the public comment forum and >>> >>> if the GNSO wishes, to provide such guidance. Guidance on this issue >>> >>> is requested to be provided by the close of the public comment forum. >>> >>> (7 March) >>> >>> >>> >>> b) Open Comment Period >>> >>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13- >>> >>> en.htm >>> >>> Comment Close: 7 March 2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> 4. Policy vs Implementation >>> >>> >>> >>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg: >>> >>> "The recent letter from the GAC as well as activities relating to >>> >>> work on the Trademark Clearinghouse, highlights a broader issue >>> >>> regarding the boundary between policy development and implementation >>> >>> work as well as the effective integration of policy development and >>> >>> integration work from the outset. >>> >>> >>> >>> Recent discussions on the Council mailing list indicate that there is >>> >>> an interest to undertake further work on this issue. At the same >>> >>> time, ICANN Staff has published a paper that is intended to >>> >>> facilitate further community discussions on this topic." >>> >>> >>> >>> b) Open Comment Period: >>> >>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/policy- >>> >>> implementation-31jan13-en.htm >>> >>> Comment Close: 21 Feb. 2013 >>> >>> Reply Comment Close: 14 March 2013 >>> >>> ICANN staff paper - draft framework for discussion: >>> >>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation- >>> >>> framework-08jan13-en.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> 5. WHOIS Privacy and Proxy Relay and Reveal Study >>> >>> >>> >>> a) Discussion item for GNSO Council Mtg: >>> >>> "At the ICANN Meeting in Toronto, Lyman Chapin presented the results >>> >>> of the survey that evaluated the feasibility of conducting a future >>> >>> in-depth study into communication Relay and identity Reveal requests >>> >>> sent for gTLD domain names registered using Proxy and Privacy >>> >>> services. The Council should consider whether to go ahead with the >>> >>> study." >>> >>> NCSG response? >>> >>> >>> >>> 6. All proxies requested found for Thursday's G-Council Mtg? >>> >>> a) Maria Farrell will serve as Magaly Pazello's proxy. (done) >>> >>> b) Who will serve as Wolfgang's proxy? >>> >>> c) All other GNSO Councilors will participate? >>> >>> >>> >>> III. Prep for Beijing ICANN Meeting #46 >>> >>> Start to Consider: What policy issues do we want to discuss with: (a) >>> >>> ICANN Board, (b) At-Large, and 2-3 topics to propose for (c) Public >>> >>> Forum? >>> >>> >>> >>> IV. AOB? >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> RELATED: >>> >>> >>> >>> GNSO Council meeting audio cast: >>> >>> http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u >>> >>> >>> >>> Agenda of 14 February GNSO Council Mtg: >>> >>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+-+14 >>> >>> +February+2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> Attendance Record of NCSG Policy & Executive Committee Members at >>> >>> NCSG Policy Meetings: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc? >>> >>> key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dGdNcVVfdHI2SWJ4dDZjU2xYaGV0WUE >>> >>> >>> >>> Open ICANN Public Comments Periods >>> >>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> IP JUSTICE >>> >>> Robin Gross, Executive Director >>> >>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA >>> >>> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 >>> >>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 617.863.0613 Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/