EEK. Please no nose cutting. (-; In any case I will try to start a comment on this over the weekend and make a first draft available. I will also add the task to the NCSG-PC task list. thanks to those who volunteered to help. I will be taking you up on the offer. avri On 13 Feb 2013, at 21:58, Dan Krimm wrote: > +1 > > This is what we feared. No more ad hoc!! Cut off the nose now. > > Dan > > > -- > Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do > not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer. > > > > At 11:53 AM +0900 2/14/13, Andrew A. Adams wrote: >> I seem to recall that our (NCUC, perhaps not NPOC) view on the Board's >> decision to grant IOC/ICRC protections without a PDP represented the nose of >> the camel in the tent and that this would likely lead to an attempt by the >> rest of the IGO community to believe that they could expect similar >> treatment). Our prediction is coming true, and this is the rest of the camel >> being pushed into the tent. I fully support strong efforts to push for a >> proper measured PDP approach to solving this issue and against these ad hoc >> special treatments for special interests. >> >> >> >> -- >> Professor Andrew A Adams [log in to unmask] >> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and >> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics >> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan http://www.a-cubed.info/ >