I'm adding mine : RRRoooaaaRRR !!! ...till the total victory ! +1 Cheers ! -Olevie- 2013/2/15, Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>: > Lol > > +1 > > Nicolas > > On 2/14/2013 10:11 AM, Carl Smith wrote: >> I may be no more than a cheerleader here, but the roar from the stands >> has often pushed the players to victory. >> >> Hear me roar. >> >> Lou >> >> On 2/14/2013 8:01 AM, Avri Doria wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> (report while listening to the g-council meeting) >>> >>> And as RCRC and IOC have already been granted the special >>> protections, at least temporarily*, we are seeing all sorts of >>> organization who claim to have the same or greater merit for such >>> protections. If the Board grants temporary* special protections to >>> IGOs, contrary to previous GNSO action** to postpone the work, the >>> clarion call will be even greater. >>> >>> Today, Thomas gave a fair review of the situation in the PDP WG, >>> though he does maintain the postion, that the letter to the Board >>> should indicate that the GNSO supports the temporary* reservations. >>> >>> David Cake spoke on the NCSG position on the issue. >>> >>> avri >>> >>> >>> * "nothing so permanent as a temporary solution" not sure of the >>> origin of this quote. >>> >>> ** or perhaps inaction - history >>> >>> GNSO 20070627-3 >>> "The GNSO Council thanks the Staff for the Issues Report on dispute >>> handling for IGO names and abbreviations. >>> The council accepts the recommendation that a PDP not be initiated at >>> this time, and that the staff continue as proposed in the issues >>> report on page 16. >>> The council requests that the staff report back to the council within >>> 3 months. The council will reconsider creating a PDP at that time." >>> >>> GNSO 20071120-1 - Postponed a decsion to intiate a PDP until a later >>> time >>> >>> and it appears the council did not get back to it until 2012 and this >>> PDP. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 14 Feb 2013, at 07:07, Rudi Vansnick wrote: >>> >>>> Fully agree with Andrew, once one obtains the right many others will >>>> stand up and request same right. >>>> >>>> Rudi Vansnick >>>> >>>> >>>> Op 14-feb-2013, om 03:53 heeft Andrew A. Adams het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> I seem to recall that our (NCUC, perhaps not NPOC) view on the Board's >>>>> decision to grant IOC/ICRC protections without a PDP represented >>>>> the nose of >>>>> the camel in the tent and that this would likely lead to an attempt >>>>> by the >>>>> rest of the IGO community to believe that they could expect similar >>>>> treatment). Our prediction is coming true, and this is the rest of >>>>> the camel >>>>> being pushed into the tent. I fully support strong efforts to push >>>>> for a >>>>> proper measured PDP approach to solving this issue and against >>>>> these ad hoc >>>>> special treatments for special interests. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Professor Andrew A Adams [log in to unmask] >>>>> Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration, and >>>>> Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics >>>>> Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan http://www.a-cubed.info/ >>> > -- Olévié (Olivier) A. A. KOUAMI Consultant et Formateur, Spécialiste en TIC Directeur Exécutif de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org et http://www.intic4dev.com) Secrétaire Général de ESTETIC (http://www.estetic.tg) Program Committee Co-Vice Chair ICANN-NPOC EC (http://www.npoc.org/) Boîte Postale 851 Tél.: (228) 23 20 65 01 Mob1.: (228) 90 98 86 50 Mob2.: (228) 97 18 36 09 Skype : olevie1 Facebook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo