Hi,
We should probably look at the value of endorsing the NCUC stmt and Annex as NCSG.
I suggest we monitor the DISCUSS list and unless anyone there or anyone on this list has an objection to the work should submit a short statement that says something like:
---
The statements <ref1> and <ref2> has been reviewed by the NCSG membership on its DISCUSS list and by the NCSG Policy Committee.
The NSCG endorses these comments.
signed
Chair NCSG-PC - assuming we have elected her
--
avri
Begin forwarded message:
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Please review: Whois 10 issues identified: annex statement
Date: 19 February 2013 12:33:55 EST
Dear colleagues,
Please see the attached annex statement on privacy and data protection. I will appreciate suggestions, changes, modifications, etc. The privacy-data protection sub group of the ‘thick’ Whois Working Group will meet again tomorrow. Tomorrow I will be submisting this Annex document as an individual (although I do not claim full credit for this document)pending endorsement by the NCUC (see attachments). The thick’ Whois WG is ready to move forward and this may be the last chance that we have to emphasize the challenges surrounding privacy and data protection. This document, preferably, needs to be made available to the full WG by next week, Tuesday.
Roy Balleste, J.S.D.
Law Library Director
Professor of Law
St. Thomas University
16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami Gardens, FL 33054 USA
1-305-623-2341