Sure, go ahead and delete it.  

I'm more interested in hearing a cogent counter argument to that point.  I hope those opposing it submit a comment.


---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Seems a good suggestion to me.

will people sign on if it is changed?

avri

On 4 Mar 2013, at 23:09, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> Hi people, I generally agree. I suggest we do not use derisive expressions like "We find these claims to be hysterical...".
>
> frt rgds
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 03/04/2013 06:22 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> Dear NCSG members:
>>
>> A group of us, including so far Robin Gross, Avri Doria, Andrew Adams, Nicolas Adam and Brenden Kuerbis, have developed a comment with ICANN on the closed generic issue.
>> You can read our comments at this Google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tPuEELJ2y6-d0hwF_qPupQb0V5OEFpqkMwcApDRNZf0/edit?usp=sharing
>> We can still add names to the list of supporters, or you could file a quick and easy individual comment with ICANN expressing your support for the statement after it comes out.
>>
>> Milton L. Mueller
>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>> Internet Governance Project
>> http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>
>