Hi, > nasty closed generics > vitriol. hmm. But, yes, I never thought it would convince you. And never in my wildest dreams did I ever think you would sign on as part of this group. And I probably should have said: "will people who agree with this positon be more inclined to perhaps maybe please sign on, if it is changed?" thanks avri On 5 Mar 2013, at 09:46, Kathy Kleiman wrote: > Why? It does not change the positions of the letter (favoring nasty closed generics). But it does change the debate to something more respectful and less vitriol. Not a reason to sign on - but a reason to support the process of disagreement... > > Kathy > >> Seems a good suggestion to me. >> >> will people sign on if it is changed? >> >> avri