Thks Robin,
Reminder: I hope you all will join in next Tuesday's NCSG Open Policy Meeting, which is an open discussion between the NCSG Policy Committee, including the NCSG GNSO Councilors and the entire NCSG membership.The meeting is on 12 March, which is 2 days before the next GNSO Council meeting to help prepare for NCSG's participation in that meeting. We will also discuss preparations for the Beijing ICANN meeting next month and review open comment periods and working groups.Draft Discussion Agenda:Dial-in and remote participation details are below. Also below is a draft discussion agenda. If anyone needs a dial-out, please let me know at least 24-hours before the meeting to ensure we have enough time to make the dial-out happen.Please join in the discussion. Thank you!Best,RobinNCSG Policy Open Meeting12 March 2013 - Tuesday21:00 - 23:00 UTCOther Time Zones:Remote Participation Details:Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/_a819976787/ncsg/Attendance Records of NCSG Open Policy Meetings:
I. Preparation for 14 March GNSO Council Meeting14 March GNSO Council Meeting Discussion Agenda:GNSO Council meeting audio cast: http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3uA. Motions to be Voted OnNONE YetB. Discussion Issues (no vote)1. Policy vs. ImplementationRecent issues highlight an ongoing broader issue regarding the boundarybetween policy development and implementation work as well as the effectiveintegration of policy development and integration work from the outset.In addition, the Council is increasingly asked to consider issues for policyguidance and may well need to look at the evolution of its own work andprocesses to accommodate this type of request.Recent discussions on the Council mailing list indicate that there is aninterest to undertake further work on this issue. At the same time, ICANNStaff has published a paperan13-en.pdf> that is intended to facilitate further community discussionson this topic.Further community discussion will take place in Beijing and the inclusion ofthis agenda item here serves to keep the issue on the agenda of the Councilin the interim.ICANN Public Comment Forum on Policy vs. Implementation:Reply Comments Due by 14 March2, Whois Privacy and Proxy Relay and Reveal StudyAt the ICANN Meeting in Toronto, Lyman Chapin presented the results of thesurvey7oct12-en.pdf> that evaluated the feasibility of conducting a futurein-depth study into communication Relay and identity Reveal requests sentfor gTLD domain names registered using Proxy and Privacy services.The Council discussed this at its 14 February 2013 meeting but did not reacha firm conclusion. Some expressed concern about going ahead with the studynow, when a lot of other Whois activities are going on, while othersappeared to support moving forward as the study could result in data thatwould help inform ongoing Whois activities.One possible way forward is that staff is asked to go ahead with the RFPfor this work and then report back to the Council before going ahead withthe study? In this way, some of the preparatory work could be done, whichwould allow us to move forward quickly if/when the Council decides to moveahead.3. GNSO Council in Beijing Meeting PlanningThe GNSO Council has the opportunity to shape the topics andsubstance of the Council's proposed meetings with other groups in Beijingsuch as the CCNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.What topics would NCSG members like to see on GNSO Council's discussion agendas in Beijng?4. Confirmation of attendance of NCSG Representatives for 14 March meeting and need for any proxies to be arranged?II. Other Policy Issues and Public CommentsA. Other Policy Issues1. 2nd Accountability & Transparency Review Team (ATRT2)Background:2. Whois Expert Working GroupBackground:Issue with under-representation of privacy experts in group(maybe Stephanie Perin could brief us on this discussion?)3. Thick Whois & Data Protection Sub-GroupBackground:4. Special Protections for Red Cross, Olympic Cmte, IGOsIGO-INGO Working GroupNCSG Input Statement:5. ICANN's Outreach & Engagement Plans6. Public Interest Commitments (PICs) of New TLD applicants7. What is happening with staff's Strawman solution & other TM issues for New TLDs?8. Registrant Agreement Amendment (RAA Negotiations)Background:B. Open ICANN Public Comments1. So-called "closed generic" or "private label" TLD debate.ICANN Public Comment Forum:Reply Comment Deadline: ?GNSO to provide policy guidance to board at end of comment period2. Revised New gTLD Registry Agreement Including Additional Public Interest Commitments SpecificationICANN Public Comment Forum:Reply Comment Deadline: 20 March3. Whois Registrant Identification Study, Draft ReportICANN Public Comment Forum:Reply Comment Deadline: 31 March4. Preliminary Issue Report on Uniformity of ReportingICANN Public Comment Forum:Comment Close: 22 March Reply Close: 12 April5. Proposed Modification of GNSO PDP Manual to Address the Suspension of a PDPICANN Public Comment Forum:Comment Close: 6 April Reply Close: 28 April6. ICANN's FY 14 Security, Stability and Resiliency FrameworkICANN Public Comment Forum:Comment Close: 20 April Reply Close: 20 MayIII. NCSG Planning for Beijing ICANN MeetingWorking draft schedule of NCSG Meetings in Beijing and proposed discussion topics so far:A. Propose Discussion Issues:1. NCSG with Board2. NCSG with At-Large3. Topics for Public ForumB. Other Beijing Meeting Plans1. Preparation Meeting for NCSG in Beijing on 28 March 15:00 UTCIV. AoB?IP JUSTICERobin Gross, Executive Director1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA