Begin forwarded message:

> From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: April 24, 2013 12:13:08 AM PDT
> To: liaison6c <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [liaison6c] New gTLD Board Committee Consideration of "GAC  
> Safeguard" Advice - Comment/Reply Periods
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gac-safeguard- 
> advice-23apr13-en.htm
>
> New gTLD Board Committee Consideration of "GAC Safeguard" Advice
>
> Comment / Reply Periods:
> Comment Open Date: 23 April 2013
> Comment Close Date: 14 May 2013 - 23:59 UTC
> Reply Open Date: 15 May 2013
> Reply Close Date: 4 June 2013 - 23:59 UTC
>
> Important Information Links
> Public Comment Announcement
> To Submit Your Comments (Forum)
> View Comments Submitted
> Brief Overview
> Originating Organization:
> New gTLD Board Committee
> Categories/Tags:
> Contracted Party Agreements
> Second-Level Domains
> Top-Level Domains
> Purpose (Brief):
> To solicit input on how the New gTLD Board Committee should address  
> GAC advice regarding safeguards applicable to broad categories of  
> New gTLD strings.
>
> Current Status:
> GAC Beijing Communiqué issued on April 11, 2013 includes GAC Advice  
> on New gTLDs.
>
> Next Steps:
> New gTLD Board Committee will consider how to address GAC advice on  
> New gTLD safeguards.
>
> Staff Contact:
> Jamie Hedlund
> Email Staff Contact
> Detailed Information
> Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose:
> On 11 April 2013, the Governmental Advisory Committee issued its  
> Beijing Communiqué in which it provided advice on New gTLDs. The  
> Board New gTLD Committee, acting on behalf of the full Board, will  
> now consider how to address the GAC Advice. To help inform this  
> process, the Committee has directed staff to solicit comment on how  
> it should address one element of the advice: safeguards applicable  
> to broad categories of New gTLD strings. Accordingly, ICANN seeks  
> public input on how the Board New gTLD Committee should address  
> section IV.1.b and Annex I of the GAC Beijing Communiqué.
>
> Section II: Background:
> One of ICANN's key responsibilities is introducing and promoting  
> competition in the registration of domain names, while ensuring the  
> security and stability of the domain name system (DNS). Below are  
> major milestones in the program leading up to the GAC Beijing  
> Communiqué:
>
> ICANN's Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) begins a  
> policy development process to consider the introduction of new  
> gTLDs in 2005
> The "GAC Principles Regarding New gTLDs" is presented to the ICANN  
> Board in 2007
> ICANN Board adopted 19 specific GNSO policy recommendations for  
> implementing new gTLDs in 2008
> ICANN undertakes implementation process to address stakeholder  
> concerns, such as the protection of intellectual property and  
> community interests, consumer protection, and DNS stability during  
> 2008-2011. This work includes public consultations, review, and  
> input on multiple draft versions of the Applicant Guidebook
> The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) and the ICANN Board  
> engage in intensive consultations regarding the GAC's "scorecard"  
> advice on new gTLDs during first half of 2011
> In June 2011, ICANN's Board of Directors approved the Guidebook  
> incorporating most of the GAC's scorecard advice and authorized the  
> launch of the New gTLD Program
> ICANN opens the New gTLD application window on January 12, 2012. On  
> June 11, 2012, ICANN reveals the 1,930 New gTLD applications  
> received and posted them for public comment
> On October 12, 2012, the GAC issues its Toronto Communiqué,  
> indicating that "[t]he statements and commitments detailed in  
> individual gTLD applications are a critical input to the GAC's  
> work" and advised the ICANN Board "that it is necessary for all of  
> these statements of commitment and objectives to be transformed  
> into binding contractual commitments, subject to compliance  
> oversight by ICANN."
> On November 20, 2012, the GAC files and publicly posts 242 Early  
> Warnings on individual New gTLD applications.
> On February 5, 2013, in response to advice provided in the Toronto  
> GAC Communiqué, the New gTLD Program Board Committee approves a  
> public comment period on a proposed "Public Interest Commitments  
> Specification" as a mechanism to transform application statements  
> into binding contractual commitments, as well as to give applicants  
> the opportunity to voluntarily submit to heightened public interest  
> commitments. On March 6. 2013, ICANN posts the 499 PIC  
> Specifications submitted by applicants.
> The GAC met during the ICANN Beijing Meeting and provided  
> additional advice to the ICANN Board regarding the New gTLD  
> program. Relevant to this public forum is Section IV.1.b of the GAC  
> Beijing Communiqué, which states, "To reinforce existing processes  
> for raising and addressing concerns the GAC is providing safeguard  
> advice to apply to broad categories of strings." The safeguard  
> advice appears in Annex I of the Beijing Communiqué.
>
> ICANN officially notified applicants of the publication of GAC  
> Advice on April 18, 2013, triggering the 21-day applicant response  
> period per the Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1. The applicants'  
> responses and the input received in this Public Comment Forum will  
> serve as important inputs to the New gTLD Board Committee's  
> consideration of the GAC Advice.
>
> Section III: Document and Resource Links:
> ICANN Announcement on GAC Advice Issued on New gTLDs
> GAC Beijing Communiqué [PDF, 156 KB]
> Section IV: Additional Information:
> N/A
>
> (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not  
> guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis,  
> reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period  
> lapses.
>
>
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> [log in to unmask]
> http://gnso.icann.org
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]