On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Today in domain incite the writer starts his blog post with: > " For the last few weeks I've been attempting to write a sensible analysis > of the Governmental Advisory Committee's advice on new gTLDs without > resorting to incredulity, hyperbole or sarcasm" > > Exactly what I felt when I took on the task!! > > So it took him a few weeks to work it out of his system. Can you all > forgive me - or perhaps respect me - for taking only one week? > > I have revised the GAC comments. They are tamer. They eliminated one > mistake that Kathy pointed out to me. the bow to division within NCSG > regarding closed generics. But they still drive home what are absolutely > essential points that MUST be made, and made strongly, in this important > comment period. Please take a fresh look. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_-B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/edit?usp=sharing I am happy with the re-write in terms of tone and substance. It is important that we make a solid statement about this to the Board, as it gives them political "cover" to say no to the GAC. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel