Hi, Objections have been filed, and people have had to respond to them (or not as they chose), even if they weren't through the Initial Evaluation first. Strictly speaking I don't think any ICC panels have been formed yet (not that I would know for sure), but I think of the process as having begun. On the list of pending cases: http://www.iccwbo.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=19327354883 .AMAZON (Application ID: 1-1315-58086) ...................................................................................................... 22 .PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 15 .PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 26 .PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) ................................................................................................ 134 I think them calling it a pending case mens it is in the process. avri On 13 May 2013, at 22:05, Milton L Mueller wrote: > Good point, Jorge, I think what Avri meant was that an objection to those strings had been lodged. Avri, can you clarify quickly? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >> Of Jorge Amodio >> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 3:54 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] GAC comments - and a note on support for >> diversity of views in our community >> >> Forgive my ignorance or I may have missed something but I don't think that >> there is any string from the first new gTLD batch in the "dispute resolution" >> stage yet, afaik that comes after the evaluation results, isn't it ? >> >> -Jorge >> >> On May 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Folks: >>> >>> The edited version of the draft is at: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_- >> B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/edit >>> >>> As a compromise to the few objections on the earlier drafts, the current >> version states it does not take a position on the amazon and patagonia >> applications. (Remember we are not commenting on individual applications >> in this stmt, we are commenting on GAC process). >>> >>> The deadline for NCSG filing these comments is tomorrow so I will be filing >> them in 24 hours unless there are any other strong objections. Thanks to >> Milton and others for all the redrafting and compromising to get a statement >> we can submit as a group. >> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Robin >>> >