I suspect that many people remain silent on this -- perhaps still stuck at
the "Denial" stage on the Kübler-Ross model ?

[Sent from my tiny screen wireless device. Excuse mobile brevity and or
unintended typos]
On Jul 3, 2013 10:54 AM, "Andrei Barburas" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> And personally, I am still not sure why everyone was/is surprised about
> the tapping and the surveillance..
>
> What Snowden did, was just confirm the "theory". At the end of the day,
> just because you don't know about something, that doesn't mean that it's
> not happening.
>
>
>
> *Andrei Barburas*
>
> CRSO/IO
>
>
>
> International Institute for Communication and Development (IICD)
>
> P.O. Box 11586, 2502 AN The Hague, The Netherlands
>
> NPOC, ICANN member
>
>
> M: +31 62 928 2879
>
> T: +31 70 311 7311 | F: +31 70 311 7322
> Website: iicd.org <http://www.iicd.org/> | Check out our Annual Report
> for 2012; We reached one million beneficiaries in Health.. Imagine that!<http://annualreport.iicd.org>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 3, 2013, at 4:13 PM, William Drake wrote:
>>
>> > On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Considering the NSA and PRISM stuff and that they are into Microsoft,
>> Google, Apple, Facebook, etc - shouldn't we assume that ICANN has been
>> compromised? Considering everything else they are into how can they not be
>> into ICANN?
>> >>
>> >> Having said that - what does that mean to our trip?
>> >
>> > Maybe that we should have all worried less about having our computers
>> compromised at the Beijing meeting?  Or, worried more broadly...
>>
>>
>>
>