I suspect that many people remain silent on this -- perhaps still stuck at the "Denial" stage on the Kübler-Ross model ? [Sent from my tiny screen wireless device. Excuse mobile brevity and or unintended typos] On Jul 3, 2013 10:54 AM, "Andrei Barburas" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > And personally, I am still not sure why everyone was/is surprised about > the tapping and the surveillance.. > > What Snowden did, was just confirm the "theory". At the end of the day, > just because you don't know about something, that doesn't mean that it's > not happening. > > > > *Andrei Barburas* > > CRSO/IO > > > > International Institute for Communication and Development (IICD) > > P.O. Box 11586, 2502 AN The Hague, The Netherlands > > NPOC, ICANN member > > > M: +31 62 928 2879 > > T: +31 70 311 7311 | F: +31 70 311 7322 > Website: iicd.org <http://www.iicd.org/> | Check out our Annual Report > for 2012; We reached one million beneficiaries in Health.. Imagine that!<http://annualreport.iicd.org> > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 3, 2013, at 4:13 PM, William Drake wrote: >> >> > On Jul 3, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Considering the NSA and PRISM stuff and that they are into Microsoft, >> Google, Apple, Facebook, etc - shouldn't we assume that ICANN has been >> compromised? Considering everything else they are into how can they not be >> into ICANN? >> >> >> >> Having said that - what does that mean to our trip? >> > >> > Maybe that we should have all worried less about having our computers >> compromised at the Beijing meeting? Or, worried more broadly... >> >> >> >