+1 Sincerely, Walid ----------------- Walid Al-Saqaf On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:32 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > fine by me, thank Avri. > > > -- > Cheers, > > McTim > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A > route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At > todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the > NPOC statement. > > > > What do people think about the following? > > > > I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether > they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name. > > > > Please comment. > > Any objections? > > Any edits? > > > > ----- > > > > > > NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC < > http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> > against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews. > > > > The NCSG also support comments submitted by: > > > > - ISPCP < > http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html> > > - Google < > http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html> > > > > against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews. > > > > The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply: > > > > We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, > the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any > further delay. > > > > > > ----- > > > > I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent > when other people are being noisy. > > > > so please say something > > > > avri >